Named languages are sociopolitical constructs because - the answer to the first question - named languages are the end result of long economic, social, and political histories. This paradigm begs the questions: (1) what is the nature of language? (2) do languages exist in isolation and are they unaffected by other languages? and (3) who must decide what counts as a language and what counts as a legitimate use of a language?Ĭontrary to what code switching suggests, named languages are not mental and psychological entities. The problem with this paradigm is that it takes an outsider’s perspective to note this separation and map how this separation is manifested in the speech of a bilingual or multilingual speaker. For example, a bilingual or multilingual Filipino speaker speaks in 3 languages: in Ilokano, in English, and in Tagalog.Īccordingly, the notion of code switching supports the idea that a bilingual or multilingual speaker is just switching or shifting from one language to another - switch to Ilokano, switch to English, and switch to Tagalog - because the brain is divided into separate languages. ![]() In code switching, languages - and the abstraction that languages carry - can be objectified into autonomous, structured, and self-contained entities. “So that is code switching,” they told me. “And Tagalog, too?” they asked with conviction. I kept telling them that in translanguaging, I use all the knowledge my learners have in Ilokano, in English, and in Tagalog to make them understand my lessons. Note: Contracted SNAP outreach providers can view and modify information for their clients who have signed a Permission to Share Information Form on the website.When I first introduced to my colleagues the approach I use in my mother tongue classes, all of them asked me what the difference was between translanguaging and code switching.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |